Re: [RFC] Asymmetric visibility

Hey Andreas, On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 10:23, Andreas Heigl <andreas@heigl.org> wrote: > > Your use case might not need them (though actually you are needing them, > you just don't use them as language feature but via the static-analysis > annotation) > > But when discussing language features we should always keep ALL users of > the language in mind. And if a feature helps in providing ways to build > more stable code on the language level then we should think about that > from a point of view of *all* users. > > And when the feature is already used via static-analysis then why not > implement that for use by *everyone* and not only those that have static > analysis in their CI toolchain. > Agreed, I was just highlighting that the need for this RFC: * niche * really niche * I'm having a hard time expressing how extremely niche it is, so I explained how I currently do it, perhaps once every 2 months :D Marco Pivetta https://twitter.com/Ocramius https://ocramius.github.io/