Re: [RFC] Asymmetric visibility

> Le 31 août 2022 à 23:27, Tim Düsterhus <tim@bastelstu.be> a écrit : > I've read through that explanation three times, but don't understand why the C#-style > syntax would require to differentiate between set and ��y{6�w� > zh7GH�-raw. Isn't the difference between "visibility only" and > "accessor" not clear [1] by having either '{' or ';' after the > 'set'? > > [1] Read: Clear to the engine, not talking about the human reader here. Even if they manage to make the difference clear for the engine without resorting to “raw”, I think that it is important to have a syntactical marker for the sake of humans. Otherwise, someone would want to incrementally improve their class property, and at some unkwown point in time, it becomes unexpectedly unusable for references and array mutations. —Claude