Re: RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion

Hi Juan, pt., 26 sie 2022 o 11:26 juan carlos morales <dev.juan.morales@gmail.com> napisał(a): > El vie, 26 ago 2022 a las 11:00, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski > (<michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > > A json_decode() is a substitute that IMO solves 99% of use > > cases. > > If I'd follow your logic and accept every small addition that handles 1% > of use cases, somebody will raise another RFC > > for simplexml_validate_string or yaml_validate and the next > PhpToken::validate. > > All above can be valid if we trust that people normally validate 300MB > payloads to do nothing if they DON'T fail and there is nothing strange > about that. > > > > Cheers, > > > > How can you make such an assertion in those numbers (99% of use cases > and son on, that you mention) ? Can you give us more information about > this assertions? > > I have provide real examples where the need to validate-only a > json-string is actually needed, also the need from our developers > community asking for this. > Your examples are a couple of functions. Assuming that they're heavily used is as true as my assumptions. Cheers,