Re: RFC json_validate() - status: Under Discussion

Hi On 9/20/22 00:15, juan carlos morales wrote:

The RFC still contains a non-empty "Open Issues" section. This needs to be resolved before the vote starts. I would also recommend inserting a closed voting widget (or multiple, if you want to have additional votes for the details), so that it's clear for everyone how exactly the vote will look like.

Tim, how should I proceed with the Open Issues/Questions? is only about the return value of the function. Should I create a poll for that? Should I leave it like this and decide during Voting phase? This question raised during the mailing discussion and never moved forward, can you advice please? Or I should delete the Open Issues/question and move forward with the current approach I choosed?

It's your RFC, you do whatever you are comfortable with. If you feel that a vote is the best option, then add a vote. If you as the author want to decide what's "best", then that's also fine. It just needs to be clear what the function will look and feel like before the vote starts - so leaving it as it is and deciding yourself *during* voting is not acceptable. Best regards Tim Düsterhus