Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Readonly class amendments
| From: | Deleu | Date: | Sat, 26 Nov 2022 20:45:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Readonly class amendments | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-119035@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022, 4:45 PM Máté Kocsis <kocsismate90@gmail.com> wrote:
> We proposed this change because it wouldn't break anything that's already
> not "broken".
>
> Regards:
> Máté
>
The example provided already raised some eyebrows from people. I think the
argument of "let's furthet enhance this 'broken' behavior" isn't that
great..
I find the ability of child class to ignore the parent readonly definition
awkward at best.
>