Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Readonly class amendments
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:57:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Readonly class amendments | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-119357@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
On 1/19/23 09:01, Máté Kocsis wrote:
As discussion apparently stalled, and since we managed to update the RFC with the recently brought up arguments, we would like to start the vote soon, possibly early next week, unless someone finds a new topic to discuss.I'm confused by the linked PRs for the implementation, because they do not appear to match what's proposed. Specifically the one for proposal #2 (allow modification in __clone) appears to include unrelated changes (a clone-with{} syntax). Also proposal #2 should be explicit about the behavior of unset(). It appears with the current implementation using unset() within __clone() is allowed and does what you expect it to do. Best regards Tim Düsterhus