Re: [RFC] isReadable/isWriteable property reflection

From: Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 11:03:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] isReadable/isWriteable property reflection
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-129131@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Am 2025-11-06 00:24, schrieb Larry Garfield:
In other news, Ilija and I said a year ago that we'd take a swing at adding isReadable/isWriteable methods to ReflectionProperty. Took a while, but here we are. A strangely small RFC from us: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/isreadable-iswriteable
I dislike implicitly “scope-dependent” functions, since they effectively act like magic. This probably makes it harder to understand for humans and static analysis tools alike. I would therefore suggest making the $scope parameter required. A user can just pass static::class themselves and static analysis tools can use class-string|null instead of class-string|"static"|null as their expected parameter type. As for the magic method logic: I would suggest to ignore the presence of __get() and __set(). This more closely aligns with the direction PHP goes towards and is also easy to work around by checking with method_exists() whether any such a method exists - the reverse is not true. Best regards Tim Düsterhus

« previous php.internals (#129131) next »