Re: [RFC] isReadable/isWriteable property reflection
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2025 20:07:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] isReadable/isWriteable property reflection | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-129644@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
Am 2025-12-17 20:48, schrieb Larry Garfield:
Oh, and one other note: It turns out that in English, both "writeable" and "writable" are nominally valid. The latter seems more common (and my spellchecker only recognizing the latter), so we've standardized on the non-E version throughout the RFC. (The code already was.)As a non-native speaker, I confirm that “writable” without the “e” is what looks more familiar to me. It's also consistent with https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.is-writable.php (although that one has an alias https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.is-writeable.php - but since the one with the “e” is the alias, it is the less preferable variant). Best regards Tim Düsterhus