Re: Bundling libxml2 default?
| From: | Jani Taskinen | Date: | Fri, 16 May 2003 20:31:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bundling libxml2 default? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-1617@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
>On Fri, 16 May 2003, Adam Dickmeiss wrote:
>
>> I still have not seen any good reason to bundle. You state at
>> http://edwardbear.org/blog/ that libxml2 is bundled because
>> expat
>> is bundled. Is that the best argument?
>>
>> You want people to switch to a more "modern" interface. The
>> new interface apparently breaks BC in multiple ways (that's
>> not your fault, the tools are just different). How about unbundling
>> expat and let people choose with configure what of those
>> libs they want to use. That solution will both make configure
>> for PHP easier to use _and_ save you from updating the bundled
>> software (for security updates, for example).
>
>I agree 100% (and if I'm not mistaken Sterling does too).
At least he did agree in Amsterdam about it. :)
Just unbundle everything and let people decided for themselves
what they want to use..
--Jani