Re: PHP 5.1
| From: | Magnus Määttä | Date: | Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:41:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5.1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-16451@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Monday 06 June 2005 11.01, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Magnus Määttä wrote:
> > And the much needed goto for the next one (5.2/5.5/6.0 or
> > whatever it will be) ?
>
> Much needed? Matter of taste as lots of existing PHP code proves
> :-) What happens if you goto into a loop? I'd rather avoid this
> mess.
Matter of taste, I'm not so sure about that. If you have a taste for
unmaintainable code to emulate goto, sure, goto isn't something you
want then. But I sure as hell don't want to maintain even my own
code.
See me earlier reply to Stanislav, I just proved my point on IRC just
after sending the mail.. Missed a few recursive function calls and
several loops. And I didn't even try to understand all logic, just
get the relevant parts out of the code. Unmaintainable is the
keyword.
Magnus Määttä
--
<Thoth_> Yeah, well that's why it's numbered 2.3.1... it's for those
of us who miss NT-like uptimes