Re: Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handlingchange and PHP 4.4.0)
| From: | Leigh Makewell | Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:21:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handlingchange and PHP 4.4.0) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-18975@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
If you don't know why it's wrong to tell them they are stupid, and can't be bother spending an extra 10 seconds formulating a respectable response instead, then you are the wrong person for the job.
Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Leigh Makewell wrote:Well then I suggest you get out there and find out what you are doing wrong because there is an increasing number of people out there who are not happy with how their bugs are being treated. This is a good place to start. http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=297291You really think I have _time_ to spend reading some rants? That'll all be out of handling the bogus reports. :)Ask them what their issues have been, what can be done to improve the process. Most of all don't *ever* just dismiss a bug report the way you do. Comments like the one here http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34196 are not acceptable.Why not? a) the guy uses configure options he doesn't know what they really do b) I couldn't reproduce it with proper configure line. Hence he's doing something stupid.You don't obviously understand how much time it takes to go through the reports. Try simulating it by taking the 10 first open reports and try reproduce all of them with the given information in the initial comment..This comment of yours amazes me! "2) I'm not bogusing automatically anything (except for few exceptions [1])" You just admited that you do automatically bogus bugs if you don't like theYes, should I have lied I don't do that?person. You should never EVER be doing that under any circumstances. Tell them it's a duplicate and link them to the relevant open bug, and then close it.That's what the s.c. quickfixs are for. Our "how-to-report" etc. pages specifically ASK people to FIRST check if the bug has already been reported. If they ignore our instructions how to reports, we don't have the right to ignore their (duplicate) report? Especially in cases where there is an OPEN one. And even more in case there is already 10 bogused ones where the reason for bogusing has been explained by 2-3 different PHP developers?!The people who submit bugs are helping you make the product better. You shouldMost of the reports are user errors and plain lazyness in reading the friendly manual. Not about making the "product" better. (since when is an opensource project a product? :)never insult a person for trying to help you. Tell them you are unable to reproduce the error and then point them to the relevant documentation on how to give you better information. In other words, help them help you!I guess this is coming back to the fact that nobody notices the positive things, only the negative. And think that "bogus" as status always means negative thing. Instead of 2nd hand rants, try read the bug mailing list for a week. That should give you better insigh what goes on on daily basis rather than these separate and very few cases where even more arrogant people than me think their civil rights have been violated and that they actually have the right to decide what is a bug and what's not..If you are getting that much hate mail then you are doing it wrong.I take it more as fan mail. I have a special folder for it too. (/dev/null :)--Jani