Re: Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handling change and PHP4.4.0)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:39:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handling change and PHP4.4.0) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-18999@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Peter Brodersen wrote:
> Comparing php bug reporting to mozilla and mysql (the latter being a
> bit unfair comparison with professional workers) I think that mozilla
> bogus bugs have better references (to dupes, etc.) and mysql bogus
> bugs are even more polite in their template answers.
MySQL has real customers, we don't have that. That doesn't mean that any
suggestions for better template answers are not appreciated.
> Some of the stuff I see on bugs.php.net that I'm not too happy about
> are "."-answers (maybe just to satisfy a requirement of some kind of
> answer) and "This is not a bug"-templates several times in a
> bug-thread.
You know we actually added the requirement only if you bogus bugs to add
a comment why. But there are quite a lot of bugs that should not have
come in in the first place, and those are hapily answered with "." only.
> I guess my only real suggestion is that some of the template-answers
> could be better worded.
Feel free to send a patch, and that was not meant as an attack.
Derick