Re: Solution to date issue in 5.1
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:56:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Solution to date issue in 5.1 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20535@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 11/26/05, Jani Taskinen <sniper@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> So you're also for letting PEAR dictate what PHP has and not the other
> way around? Somehow this doesn't sound right.
No, I do not let Derick decided on his own what should be commited in
a last RC. I do not let Derick decides what is good for me (c) or not.
This class was added "just because people asked" at some point and
was inside #ifdef for a very good reason, this code does not get any
agreement, is not stable (see the trivial fix from Tony today).
This ext/date problem is something I will hate to see happen again.
Not because I also work on that, it is not the 1st time that my
proposals are ignored, but because Derick thinks he can do what he
wants and when he wants, as a PHP QA member, I find this attitude
pathetic.
--Pierre