Re: namespace separator poll, update

From: Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:02:06 +0000
Subject: Re: namespace separator poll, update
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-20737@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I'm sorry if I say stupid stuff. My previous post actually was the first post I've ever made to a newsgroup! Please bare with me while I adjust to the etiquettes. :) Anyway. Somebody has probably already suggested this. But how about: namespace1}{Date::myfunction(); namespace2}{Date::Otherfunction(); Greg Beaver wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
OG>>BUT the discussion is not only about possibility but also about what you OG>>would like. The ":" for example would work if mandatory whitespace would OG>>be introduced for the ternary BUT this is very very bad. If my vote is counted (not that I asked for it :) then I vote against all funky syntax, present and future. :: is only thing that is obvious and somehow connected to the world of PHP as we know it now.
Agreed, I am only in favor of :: if it is technically possible. Greg


« previous php.internals (#20737) next »