Re: namespace separator poll, update

ew On 11/28/05, Bart de Boer <bart@mediawave.nl> wrote: > I'm sorry if I say stupid stuff. My previous post actually was the first > post I've ever made to a newsgroup! Please bare with me while I adjust > to the etiquettes. :) > > Anyway. Somebody has probably already suggested this. But how about: > > namespace1}{Date::myfunction(); > namespace2}{Date::Otherfunction(); > > > > > Greg Beaver wrote: > > Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > > >> OG>>BUT the discussion is not only about possibility but also about > >> what you > >> OG>>would like. The ":" for example would work if mandatory whitespace > >> would > >> OG>>be introduced for the ternary BUT this is very very bad. > >> > >> If my vote is counted (not that I asked for it :) then I vote against > >> all funky syntax, present and future. :: is only thing that is obvious > >> and somehow connected to the world of PHP as we know it now. > > > > > > Agreed, I am only in favor of :: if it is technically possible. > > > > Greg > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >