Re: SplObjectStorage
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Sat, 28 Jan 2006 03:26:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: SplObjectStorage | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-21711@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Jeff,
what the hell do you want?
Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:23:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi, Marcus,
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> yes, it is a conainer and not a set.
> So why not call it a container instead of storage?
>> And it cannot take anything other
>> than php objects. That's why.
> SplObjectContainer?
> But, then, it has that uniqueness constraint. The SplObjectStorage
> name doesn't convey that idea at all.
> SplUniqueObjectContainer?
> From an API standpoint (rather than an implementation standpoint), I
> don't understand the need for the object only constraint in PHP.
> SplUniqueZvalContainer?
> SplUniqueValueContainer?
> SplUniqueMemberContainer?
> Yours,
> Jeff
Best regards,
Marcus