Re: Moving to PECL

James Cox wrote:

So now that the PEAR framework for bundling extensions is in place, I figured I'd start a thread about moving all extensions to PECL, and then selectively bundling them from PECL (perhaps maintaining physical aliases as well.)

I'm +1 on this.. And already offered to move stuff, so one other point on Sterling's list is extensions that will move, and extensions that will stay firmly where they are. -- james

All extensions should move. Outside of ext/standard and maybe one or two others, there is nothing that could not benefit from the possibility of a seperate release cycle. With the bundle capability, and cvs linkage, there should be no ill effect on developers or installation by making that move. Shane