Re: Moving to PECL

"Georg Richter" <georg@php.net> escribió en el mensaje news:19QrJS-1tt1xQ0@fmrl00.sul.t-online.com... > On Sunday 08 June 2003 18:23, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > The one point on the QA issue is that nobody ever looks through all the > > PECL extensions, but we occasionally grep through all the ext/* extensions > > to make sure that an API change, or just a simple mistake that we found > > does not occur in other extensions. > > > > We need to raise the priority of PECL/* in the hearts and minds of the > > developers so that instead of just scanning ext/* we also scan PECL/*. > > Getting it out of PEAR and up to its own top-level cvs module is a start. > > It really doesn't have anything to do with PEAR and needs to be a lot > > closer to the php-dev crowd than the pear-dev crowd. > > +1 > > For everyone, developers and users this would be a clear scheme. > Easy to find the stuff you need. As Rasmus said, PEAR and PECL are diffrent > things and should be separated. > Btw, would be nice if some php-developers get involved in the pecl extension managment of the pear installer as they know pretty much about the real needs for them. I could write a quick "PEAR installer" doc or answer dubts about the implementation. Tomas V.V.Cox