Re: Moving to PECL
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Mon, 09 Jun 2003 07:57:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Moving to PECL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-2249@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> > I agree 100%.
> >
> > Also, do note that all common extensions will still be direct aliases.
> > Meaning there should be no difference from a development perspective
> > (we'll still have the same set of extensions in cvs, for all practical
> > purposes). The only difference is that when the release manager goes
> > ahead and makes a new release, he'll grab the latest stable release from
> > PECL (which is aliased), instead of using whatever happens to be in CVS.
>
> But if that is the only motivation here, we don't need to move anything,
> we just need developers to tag their extensions when they deem them stable
> and makedist simply checks out the latest stable version of the extension.
> Problem solved. You need a better reason for highly disruptive CVS
> changes.
I kinda agree with this...
Derick
--
"my other box is your windows PC"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------