Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
| From: | Andrey Hristov | Date: | Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:14:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-22271@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
sorry for sending second email. Another choice could be
leave,
which seems better than escape (clashes with escaping sequences).
Andrey
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi, Dmitry Stogov wrote:I am indifferent - "goto" or "jump", but may be others don't.what aboutescape?Thanks. Dmitry.Andrey-----Original Message----- From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net] Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:09 AM To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion) On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:Hi, The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner. So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the"goto.diff" patchin 24 hour. The last question: What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump"instead of"goto"?I don't really mind... but I wonder why you want to do this? Both work equally well and most people are familiar with the term "goto". Derick --