Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
| From: | Bart de Boer | Date: | Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:12:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-22284@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:Even though I like "jump", people will most likely be searching for "goto" (PHP manual) or "goto PHP" (Google) when they're trying to find out if PHP has such a functionality. So, maybe it's better to just call it "goto". PHP will give some kind of warning if it is used incorrectly, right? They'll learn soon enough. BartHi, The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner. So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the "goto.diff" patch in 24 hour. The last question: What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of "goto"? It may make sense, because it is not a full analog of C's goto statement. It is a limited "goto". It allows jump back and forward, but not INTO loops and switch statements.+1 for jump Greg