Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion)
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:42:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: GOTO and/or BREAK LABEL (conclusion) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-22276@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
jump makes more sense than goto. We bounced it off in the Paris meeting, IIRC it was fairly popular in case we go down the route of this semantics.
Zeev
At 10:03 09/03/2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi, The solution (2) - "goto only" is the winner. So in case of no serious objections, I'll commit the "goto.diff" patch in 24 hour. The last question: What do you thin about Andi's solution about using "jump" instead of "goto"? It may make sense, because it is not a full analog of C's goto statement. It is a limited "goto". It allows jump back and forward, but not INTO loops and switch statements. Thanks. Dmitry. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php