RE: [PHP-DEV] tsrm_shutdown() and the CLI SAPI
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:05:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] tsrm_shutdown() and the CLI SAPI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-23847@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Stepth,
I reproduced crash of php-gtk on linix with php-zts.
I mean running "php -v" then php.ini contains "extension=gtk2.so".
The crash occurs only then php compiled with --enable-debug.
The reason of the crash is a bug in ZE that is activated by memory leaks in
php-gtk.
In case of "php -v" we don't do request startup/shutdown and as result we
don't handle memory leaks on request shutdown.
During tsrm_shutdown() shutdow_nmemory_manager() is called after
sapi_shutdown() and as result we cannot access sapi_globals then trying to
print information about memory leaks and crashes.
The solution - don't print information about memory leaks during
tsrm_shutdown().
Patch for PHP_5_2 is attached, but it can be manually applied to any
version.
Steph, does you crash(es) go away with this patch?
I am going to commit patch in 24h.
Any objections?
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:andi@zend.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: Steph Fox; Frank M. Kromann
> Cc: 'internals'; 'Antony Dovgal'; Dmitry Stogov; 'Xuefer'
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tsrm_shutdown() and the CLI SAPI
>
>
> As we are not planning to release a new version within the next
> couple of weeks, I suggest before jumping to conclusions we
> take a look at it.
>
> If you really need to comment out that line in the meanwhile
> that's OK with me.
>
> Andi
>
> At 09:50 PM 5/31/2006, Steph Fox wrote:
> >>>Yes, it would, given the root cause - but would you really want to
> >>>break the whole of PHP for an academic exercise?
> >>
> >>It's not really an academic exercise. If we know there's a bug
> >>someplace we should at least look into it and try and understand it.
> >
> >Frank's referring to Zeev's three-years-ago decision to simply opt
> >out of tsrm_shutdown() here... he's suggesting we revert it.
> >
> >>Then if we decide to remove the trsm_shutdown call for a good
> >>reason (circular dependency, blah blah blah) then we can do that
> >>and put a nice fat comment on why it's the right thing to do. But I
> >>do think it's benefical to try and understand what's happening.
> >
> >Fine, but breaking working code while you're trying to understand
> >what's happening is far from beneficial to our users. Can't
> we at least #0 it?
> >
> >>
> >>Andi
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>