RE: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada

From: Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:19:01 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-27690@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Btw, having a request object was one of the #1 requests in framework :) People actually really like encapsulating this because it also makes unit testing easier down the road... Just mentioning this because I don't think we should be too set with our ways esp. for people who need to accomplish more functionality. Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 3:16 AM > To: Andrei Zmievski > Cc: Dmitry Stogov; Sara Golemon; internals@lists.php.net; > Andi Gutmans; Zeev Suraski; Stanislav Malyshev > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada > > Hello Andrei, > > On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <andrei@gravitonic.com> wrote: > > Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI > > object or a function to retrieve GPC values. > > You will be surprised, really :) > > > Really, how much of a > > performance hit is Sara's patch going to be, compared to > other things > > in PHP 6? > > It is to early to argue about performance problems in my > humble opinion. My point was more about the complexity. > That's why I prefer the other solution which simply moves the > JIT to runtime without other changes but a function to get > the encoding error. > > To be honest, I do not understand the resistance to commit > experimental code in head. For what really matters, we need a > working solution. It does not need to be perfert, it needs to > work (more or less). We still have plenty of time to improve > it until 6 is out (not going to happen in the next months anyway). > > --Pierre >

« previous php.internals (#27690) next »