Re: What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6?

Pierre wrote:

On 6/19/07, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:

But this is no different from writing code that will work on both PHP 5 and PHP 6. The only difference is that instead of checking for PHP 5 you will be checking for Unicode. Like I said, we don't want the Unicode decision to be synonymous with PHP 5 vs. PHP 6 because then the non-Unicode folks will never get the benefits of the non-Unicode improvements in PHP 6 and we would be forced to support PHP 5 for a lot longer. We really stretch our already thing resources in order to support multiple branches, so anything we can do to get as many people as possible onto the same codebase helps us a lot.

Just as a last (hopefully) comment, even if nothing seemed to have an influence, no matter how many we are to prefer a unicode only mode (so far only you are in favour of it, maybe Andree too but I don't remember his opinion on this topic :). The gain we hope to have by keeping a non unicode mode is about having more users moving to PHP6. I would like to know why it will work better than with php5, any thoughts? And let forget that maintaining (and develop/implement) these two modes will obviously take more time.

I agree, we tried out best in PHP5 to provide support for PHP4 and it seems this has not been overly successful. Why will this be any easier for PHP6? Maybe we should try a different approach. Lets not hold ourselves back. Lets break BC where it makes sense. Projects like PEAR etc. could always claim that its also PHP5 compatible without truly moving over. If we make a clean cut, this will not work anymore and instead we have an opportunity to clean up, improve performance a bit by removing unicode off hacks and let users migrate or stay. Sooner or later they will be attracted by new shiny stuff and then they will make a true effort to migrate over instead of these half migrations that happened with PHP5 "adoption". regards, Lukas