Re: What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6?

Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Jochem Maas wrote: >> Pierre wrote: >>> On 7/6/07, Stefan Priebsch <stefan.priebsch@e-novative.de> wrote: >>> >>>> There must be a reason to upgrade to a new PHP version (usually >>>> features, maybe performance increase etc.). But there also must be no >>>> reason not to upgrade. But you all know this, it has been said before. >>> Namespace is one _very_ important reason. If we need a "marketing" >>> argument for PHP6 outside unicode, it is the one. I would also like to >>> do not backport it (but we can backport it as well, my main problem is >>> only this flag). >> >> late static binding is another reason (are we still going to get that?) > > well .. last I heard we are still stuck on this one, since it would > require expanding the general zval structure. oh, I see (well kind of), does this mean it may get taken off the table? or is it slated as definite (assuming a satisfactory implementation can be created)? sorry to be a bore about LSB, it's just that it's the thing I look forward to most :-), I have missed it since php5 was still in RC and I really believe that LSB would improve php's OO model. thank you for your feedback, regards, Jochem > > regards, > Lukas >