Re: RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)
| From: | BuildSmart | Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:38:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-32246@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi, to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already adopted zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a working tar implementation that allows reading of tgz and tar.bz2 files as well. Yest the purpose of Phar is very different. Anyway can it be that Dmitry was using an old version of Phar where indeed the performance was bad?While this may seem trivial to some, is there a reason that spl is disabled when phar is enabled?
marcus- -- Dale -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG5oxg0hzWbkf0eKgRAq03AKDOy7h6XGSg9nZ4C5ZdCCkmu+0dyACdH8VB 4aUIE+OBi0ArJG5W+mYxf2U= =tWzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----