Re: RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)
| From: | Gregory Beaver | Date: | Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:58:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-32251@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
BuildSmart wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>
> > Hello Andi,
>
> > to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already
> adopted
> > zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a
> working
> > tar implementation that allows reading of tgz and tar.bz2 files as well.
> > Yest the purpose of Phar is very different. Anyway can it be that
> Dmitry was
> > using an old version of Phar where indeed the performance was bad?
>
> While this may seem trivial to some, is there a reason that spl is
> disabled when phar is enabled?
It might seem trivial to others because you're not reading the source
correctly. SPL is not disabled when phar is enabled.
Greg