Re: RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 11, 2007, at 09:58:16, Gregory Beaver wrote:

BuildSmart wrote:

On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote:

Hello Andi,

to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already

adopted

zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a

working

tar implementation that allows reading of tgz and tar.bz2 files as well. Yest the purpose of Phar is very different. Anyway can it be that

Dmitry was

using an old version of Phar where indeed the performance was bad?

While this may seem trivial to some, is there a reason that spl is disabled when phar is enabled?

It might seem trivial to others because you're not reading the source correctly. SPL is not disabled when phar is enabled.

doesn't the following mean it's disabled or am I interpreting it wrong? PHP_ADD_EXTENSION_DEP(phar, spl, false)

Greg

- -- Dale -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG5qkX0hzWbkf0eKgRAraRAJ9ZEGTO3iSbqMuls3bjTsbYubBecACgu24O xi3+5P3vzjWQvILG+9/zwrI= =UxTD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----