Re: Namespace

The implementation as it is now works. It's functional, and useful. Minor issues like import/use can be worked out when necessary, but for now I see this as something that can be released (provided that most of the bugs are worked out). Multiple namespaces per file is the only thing I see as a feature that should be added, but as of now it is not a pressing issue. On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:36 -0800, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > implementation [details] not the concept. I believe that the implementation > > needs a little ironing out ... what's the harm in taking the time to do this? > > or at least taking the time to let consensus take hold? > > No harm, but we will have multiple namespaces per file figured out > pretty soon, and I don't see any new developments with the braces thing, > so what exactly would we wait for? > > > metrics that support your argument that namespaces will make code more > > maintainable, offer better structure and cleaner code. > > Obviously, we can't have any metrics of anything until the namespaces > are implemented and used in some serious project, which can't happen > until we have a release with namespaces in it. > > > it remains nothing more than a pontential even after release. in the > same > > For some time, yes. And if one chooses not to use it, maybe forever for > that particular user. > I'm all for discussing practical ones, but frankly I don't see any new > issues here worth delaying anything. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com >