Re: Namespace

On Wednesday 05 December 2007, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > implementation [details] not the concept. I believe that the > > implementation needs a little ironing out ... what's the harm in taking > > the time to do this? or at least taking the time to let consensus take > > hold? > > No harm, but we will have multiple namespaces per file figured out > pretty soon, and I don't see any new developments with the braces thing, > so what exactly would we wait for? Actually, as I've said previously IF we switch to multiple namespaces per file (which I honestly have no strong opinion on), switching to braces at the same time makes sense. It's much easier to parse visually (by a human) in that case, and there's no reason I know of why we couldn't still forbid non-namespaced code in a namespace-using file to avoid confusing weirdness. -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 larry@garfieldtech.com ICQ: 6817012 "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas Jefferson