Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload
| From: | Andrew Mason | Date: | Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:28:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-34274@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for your replies guys.
Part of the reason why I asked here is because of a previous posting a
while back where Stas seemed to suggest that the spl_autoloader was
superior but from reading the api i didn't know if this was purely
from a flexibility point of view or if there was more too it. I
probably should have been more specific in my question.
kind regards
Andrew
On 12/29/07, Pierre <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 3:30 PM, <david.coallier@nyphp.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Andrew Mason <slackmase2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > > Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
> > > the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
> > >
> >
> > Please use php-general for that kind of question.
>
> This question makes sense here and brings yet again the question why
> such things are not available by default.
>
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>