Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload

From: Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:28:53 +0000
Subject: Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-34274@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Thanks for your replies guys. Part of the reason why I asked here is because of a previous posting a while back where Stas seemed to suggest that the spl_autoloader was superior but from reading the api i didn't know if this was purely from a flexibility point of view or if there was more too it. I probably should have been more specific in my question. kind regards Andrew On 12/29/07, Pierre <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 3:30 PM, <david.coallier@nyphp.com> wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Andrew Mason <slackmase2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over > > > the standard __autoload ? is there any ? > > > > > > > Please use php-general for that kind of question. > > This question makes sense here and brings yet again the question why > such things are not available by default. > > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | > http://www.libgd.org >

« previous php.internals (#34274) next »