Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:31:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-34306@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Dec 30, 2007 6:58 PM, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> SPL simply allows two things:
> a) a stack that hooks into __autoload
> b) a default implementation that may be used (with ot without the former)
>
> We try to group functionality into extensions where we seem fit. And by the
> time I implemented spl_autoload stuff it made sense to put it into the SPL
> extension. Just because that extension was meant to be the home for more
> advanced OOP stuff.
I see nothing advanced in these features and a couple of other neither
(we gave a short list already). Can we at least always enabled by in
5.3 and be done with it? It is annoying to have setups without it.
Happy new year! :-)
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org