Re: spl_autoload vs __autoload

Hello Johannes, I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always like ext/standard? marcus Monday, December 31, 2007, 7:31:40 PM, you wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007 6:58 PM, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote: >> Hello Andrew, >> >> SPL simply allows two things: >> a) a stack that hooks into __autoload >> b) a default implementation that may be used (with ot without the former) >> >> We try to group functionality into extensions where we seem fit. And by the >> time I implemented spl_autoload stuff it made sense to put it into the SPL >> extension. Just because that extension was meant to be the home for more >> advanced OOP stuff. > I see nothing advanced in these features and a couple of other neither > (we gave a short list already). Can we at least always enabled by in > 5.3 and be done with it? It is annoying to have setups without it. > Happy new year! :-) Best regards, Marcus