Re: Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:22:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-35119@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Pierre,
basically you are saying that zip would not have been used by anybody if
you hadn't forced us by mail bombardment to include it. So now I am
wondering why you care so much what goes in and what goes out? After all it
is the RMs decision. And we might get asked or not.
marcus
Saturday, February 2, 2008, 9:38:04 PM, you wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008 9:14 PM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:
>> Thoughts?
> It is also possible to have both. It is even a good thing for what
> linux distributions told me about zip. About moving all extensions to
> PECL, we already discussed this problem and the conclusion was to
> continue like now. There was good reasons listed.
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
Best regards,
Marcus