Re: Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:33:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-35166@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Steph Fox wrote:
> Everything else - the fashionistas (JSON, xmlreader/writer) and the downright
> useful for some but not all (fileinfo, json, com_dotnet, posix) and the quirky
> stuff (pretty much anything Sara came up with) - should be in PECL.
I see another issue after reading this, and that is that it makes it
much harder for users to depend on specific extensions just being always
available by default. It's important for application distributers to
have this core set of extensions to rely on. It's annoying enough that
some distributions (gentoo, freebsd) already use --disable-all and their
users then bugging us (or me) with "you should check that SPL is enabled
in your code".
regards,
Derick