Re: Re: 5.3 Release Planning

On 3/7/08, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote: > On 07.03.2008 05:43, Gregory Beaver wrote: > > Just a quick note: I'd like to consider another possible approach, > > having pecl/phar synced from stable pecl release. > > > I'm not sure it's good idea. > IMO it should go trough much more thorough testing to be included into the core. > > And I'm still not convinced we should include any PECL extensions in the core, > I believe it should go the other way round. it would be better to say not "in core", but "in official distribution" until there is convenient cross-platform of installing extensions from pecl, important ones should be included in distribution -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/