Re: Re: [PATCH] LSB - new patches for forward_static_call and parent:: forwarding (was: 5.3 Release Planning)

Hello, the forward_static_call looks like a decent non-intrusive solution, and your patch looks good from what I can tell! I guess you should commit it so it can be documented and all. regards On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Mike Lively <m@digitalsandwich.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Mike Lively <m@digitalsandwich.com> wrote: > > > > > New patches can be found at > > http://www.digitalsandwich.com/Patches/index.html > > > > I have fixed the forward_static_call (I am not attached to the name and am > > open to suggestions) patch to use a callable. In doing this I also added an > > additional check to make sure the called_class is only forwarded if the > > class whose method being called is an ancestor of the current class. If that > > is not the case, then the behaviour will actually be identical to > > call_user_func*. > > > > I created against patch for both 5_3 and 6. > > > > I have also updated and attached that parent:: forwarding patch for both > > 5_3 and 6. In the event that someone wants to look at that (PLEASE??? ;)). > > > > - Mike Lively > > > > Has anyone had a chance to look at this? I don't want to forget about it > again or before I know it 5.3 RCs will be out and I will have missed the > boat...again... > -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction. -- Pascal