Re: phar in win32 snapshots

From: Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:10:50 +0000
Subject: Re: phar in win32 snapshots
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-40164@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I wonder if I'm completely stupid or unable to get you actually read the mails before complaining endlessly and obviously 48hours before the release because we have nothing else to do than that.
I complain endlessly because I see an apparently endless line of things that worry me, some of which - like this one - are hidden from view.
And I still have no answer to my question. Why should it be built statically?
Because thankfully, Pierre, you are not RM!
Take a big breath, smoke something, and then try to reply again after having carefully read my replies. Thanks.
I have a better idea. Next time you make a change that impacts the way extensions are built and distributed, recognize that you have a responsibility to fix any ensuing breakage. It would save a lot of confusion and unpleasantness. Whether an extension is enabled by default (ie built-in statically) or not is the decision of the Release Management team. Not you. Not me. Not Greg. Not Tony. I'm not sure what's so hard to understand about that. - Steph
-- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org


« previous php.internals (#40164) next »