'Sanity' tally to date

Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to be namespace support in 5.3. At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace'). Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a point. (A weighted version is also offered here.) D/S means 'with different separator'.

Name                Issue A                    Issue B

======================================================

Greg                #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
Guilherme           #3                         Yes
Kalle               #4                         Yes
Tony Bibbs          #3                         Yes
Jaroslav Hanslik    #1 (alt #3)                Yes
Nathan Rixham       #4 (D/S)                   N/A
Liz                 #1 or #3                   Yes
Andrei        - 'agreed with Gregs approach'   N/A
Janusz Lewandowski  #4                         Yes
Steph               #3 (alt #2)                Abstained

Josh Davies - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A

Hannes        - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A
Lester        - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD           N/A
Alexey              #3                         Yes
Marc Boeren         #1 (D/S)                   N/A
Derick              #1                         No
Vesselin Kenashkov  #3                         Yes
Lars                #3 (alt #2)                N/A
Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3)                Yes
Jochem Maas         #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
Richard Quadling    #1 (alt #2)                No

Issue A: #1 - 8 (1 with different separator) #2 - 5 #3 - 11 #4 - 3 (1 with different separator) Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1): #1 - 12 + 2 = 14 #2 - 4 + 3 = 7 #3 - 12 + 5 = 17 #4 - 6 + 0 = 6 Issue B: Yes - 11 No - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho') Abs - 1 N/A - 7