Re: 'Sanity' tally to date

Hello Lukas, --stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code; marcus Thursday, October 16, 2008, 6:51:29 PM, you wrote: > On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote: >> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and >> relevant >> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if >> there's to >> be namespace support in 5.3. >> >> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full >> disambiguation >> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace'). >> >> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a >> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.) >> >> D/S means 'with different separator'. > i guess i should note that Steph's tally only includes votes on Greg's > proposal. Stas proposal is obviously also still up for vote. In that > sense "doesnt work" is maybe a bit too harshly said in the appendix of > Greg's proposal, though it does obviously point out an issue. Overall > no proposal comes without some caveat (or this all would be easy). > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > mls@pooteeweet.org Best regards, Marcus