Re: 'Sanity' tally to date

On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:

Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to be namespace support in 5.3. At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace'). Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a point. (A weighted version is also offered here.) D/S means 'with different separator'.

i guess i should note that Steph's tally only includes votes on Greg's proposal. Stas proposal is obviously also still up for vote. In that sense "doesnt work" is maybe a bit too harshly said in the appendix of Greg's proposal, though it does obviously point out an issue. Overall no proposal comes without some caveat (or this all would be easy). regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.org