Re: APC in trunk
| From: | Lester Caine | Date: | Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:05:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: APC in trunk | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-48861@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 6/20/10 1:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:Well eaccelerator has served me well for years on both Windows and Linux and has been listed on wikipedia for years before APC was added ;) Just because people don't like restrictive source management does not mean good code is not available. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php( Foregot to change address again :( ) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:pecl has been around for years. Nobody else has submitted an opcode cache to pecl. We certainly would not have rejected any such submission, and we still won't.What are your views on including APC in the core, or reasons not to?Dictatorship? Optional module which have well used alternatives should not be proced on by default! Probably more people use alternatives and have for years?