Re: APC in trunk
| From: | jvlad | Date: | Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:58:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: APC in trunk | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-48900@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Rasmus Lerdorf" <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote in message
news:4C1ED90D.2030707@lerdorf.com...
> On 6/20/10 7:44 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Can you elaborate? What "average user"-facing features are non-obvious?
>>> We should document them if nothing else.
>>
>> This recently caught my attention:
>> http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16745
>> As I understood from this bug, APC changes how PHP works (since it works
>>....
>
> By the way, including APC in the core is actually likely to fix this
> problem because it has to do with the order the rshutdown functions are
> called. Read Christian's excellent description of the problem here:
>
> http://news.php.net/php.internals/46999
>
> -Rasmus
concerting http://news.php.net/php.internals/46999
If APC is that well-maintained as many people impressed here, why this
rather simple bug is still not fixed during the year?
Why the other php opcode caches do NOT impose similar problems?
Isn't it yet another reason not to add APC into the core?
Doesn't it plainly show that there is no benefits from the fact that people
behind APC are known?
-jv