Re: APC in trunk

On 6/20/10 2:05 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> On 6/20/10 1:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote: >>> ( Foregot to change address again :( ) >>> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >>>> What are your views on including APC in the core, or reasons not to? >>> >>> Dictatorship? >>> Optional module which have well used alternatives should not be proced >>> on by default! Probably more people use alternatives and have for years? >> >> pecl has been around for years. Nobody else has submitted an opcode >> cache to pecl. We certainly would not have rejected any such >> submission, and we still won't. > > Well eaccelerator has served me well for years on both Windows and Linux > and has been listed on wikipedia for years before APC was added ;) Just > because people don't like restrictive source management does not mean > good code is not available. No, it is not enough to just have source code. The developers need to play along as well. -Rasmus