Re: annotations again
| From: | Chad Fulton | Date: | Tue, 10 May 2011 20:03:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: annotations again | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52258@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:35 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
<guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on an extensive chat with Matthew, I think we reached some consensus.
> I'll write another RFC related to Annotations in docblocks, then we
> can chat until reach some standardization and availability.
>
> I'll keep the old one for history purposes. It seems that none from
> core php devs accepted it, so I'll move it to rejected.
> As I told you previously, all I wanted was some good feedback to give
> a north and that's what I had.
>
> As soon as I finish the new RFC, I'll open another thread here for
> fine-grain the support and discuss architecture.
> I'll keep Stas comments in mind when creating it, so it would help in
> discussions. It seems we still have 2 weeks to discuss the new idea
> and less than 2 months to get it ready if everyone agreed.
Please first take a look at the current RFC regarding parsing
docblocks: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser . Even if
you want
to put up a competing RFC, at least you can use it as a point of
reference.
Chad