Re: annotations again
| From: | guilhermeblanco@gmail.com | Date: | Wed, 11 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: annotations again | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52332@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
@duke: Exactly.
The idea is to expose this support through Reflection API
@Marcelo: It is listed that this support would be necessary.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, dukeofgaming <dukeofgaming@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:57 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
> <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi duke,
>>
>> I moved it to rejected in pro of a new proposal.
>> I briefly drafted it here:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock
>>
>> There's a lot of things to be officially defined, but basic idea is there.
>> I expect to have a chat with interested core devs to see what can be
>> done in this subject and find some common sense. =)
>>
>
> Ok, so the agreed direction now would be to have some initial support for
> annotations in comments to achieve syntax and data uniformity, and after its
> necessity/utility is obvious to everybody then we can move to native
> support?. Is this correct?.
> BTW, I love the idea of using JSON as value.
--
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
São Paulo - SP/Brazil