Re: annotations again

From: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000
Subject: Re: annotations again
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-52332@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
@duke: Exactly. The idea is to expose this support through Reflection API @Marcelo: It is listed that this support would be necessary. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, dukeofgaming <dukeofgaming@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:57 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com > <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi duke, >> >> I moved it to rejected in pro of a new proposal. >> I briefly drafted it here: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock >> >> There's a lot of things to be officially defined, but basic idea is there. >> I expect to have a chat with interested core devs to see what can be >> done in this subject and find some common sense. =) >> > > Ok, so the agreed direction now would be to have some initial support for > annotations in comments to achieve syntax and data uniformity, and after its > necessity/utility is obvious to everybody then we can move to native > support?. Is this correct?. > BTW, I love the idea of using JSON as value. -- Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil

« previous php.internals (#52332) next »