Re: SplClassLoader RFC Voting phase
| From: | Will Fitch | Date: | Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:56:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: SplClassLoader RFC Voting phase | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-56102@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Well, my only concern with splitting it into the three questions is
> that the RFC specifically mentioned putting it in SPL.
>
> So there wasn't really any discussion or RFC of either of the other
> two points. While it's not really a big deal, I think that #3 at
> least requires some more discussion as it does open some doors (both
> good and bad) that are completely different from #1 or #2.
>
> I don't think the voting is vague at all. The RFC was to put the
> class loader into SPL. So that's what's being voted on. No more, no
> less. Adding different options and votes at this point would at least
> partially undermine the RFC process (as in voting without time for
> comment)...
>
I agree. The push has been for adding to SPL in 5.4. If the vote fails, then the RFC should be
restructured to suit the needs for the next iteration.
> I do disagree *slightly* with the language though (I think it should
> say "Should SplClassLoader be a feature in PHP 5.4 and in SPL" instead
> of "Do you want". Because I think there are at least some people who
> want it, but agrees that it doesn't belong in its current form (at
> least some I've talked to). It's barely even worth pointing out, but
> since I'm writing the email anyway...
>
> Just my opinion,
>
> Anthony Ferrara
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Klaus Silveira
> <contato@klaussilveira.com> wrote:
>> I agree with Guilherme on this one. The voting objective seems very vague
>> currently.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:29 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
>> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd rather suggest to split this poll into 3 questions:
>>>
>>> 1- The same as you wrote. Having it in SPL and in PHP 5.4
>>> 2- Have it in PHP 5.4 as an external extension (FIG, PSR or PSG),
>>> enabled by default.
>>> 3- As an external extension, disabled by default. This would require
>>> PHP core to reserve the namespace for us.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:41 AM, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote:
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> After lengthy discussions and various opinion, we believe this issue
>>>> has been discussed at length and the PSR-0 has had this standard
>>>> effective for the past 1.5 year.
>>>>
>>>> The SplClassLoader RFC has moved to "voting" stage. Please cast your
>>>> votes at
>>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/splclassloader/vote
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for all the interest showed so far,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David Coallier
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Guilherme Blanco
>>> Mobile: +55 (11) 8118-4422
>>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
>>> São Paulo - SP/Brazil
>>>
>>> --
>>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Klaus Silveira
>> (011) 8564-2492
>> www.klaussilveira.com
>>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>