Re: [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL

fixed On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Keloran <ava3ar@gmail.com> wrote: > isnt option3 and option1 the same ? (unless i cant read properlly {very > possible}) > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> It should have been done before 5.4.0 was out, but better late than never. >> >> I put together four options here: >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol >> >> I'm in favor of option #1, as it gives enough time to our users to >> migrate by reducing the maintenance period to only one year. >> >> Suggestions or comments welcome, >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | >> http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org