Re: [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL

they are totally unrelated. The discussion here is not about whether next will be late but when 5.3 will end. The key here is not the date itself but the ability for hosting companies, distros, etc. to plan a migration or an EOL. One or two months less or more do not change anything, as long as the support of a given branch is inside the plan (three years from every new release from 5.4 and later). On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > that's just the schedule >> >> Yes, and as of now this is the plan. The idea is the same, that does >> not affect the EOL of 5.3 is php-next is a month late, not at all. >> > > yep, and I explained why I think that it is a bad idea if the releases and > the EOLs can shift apart. > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org